SiteGood queries/bad queries for sources
I’m fascinated by the queries I read on Peter Shankman’s Help a Reporter Out list. I subscribe because as an author, I’m always looking for ways to promote my books, but I admit, I’m also curious how other writers look for experts and sources.
So here are two to compare and contrast. I’ve changed details, but the structure of the queries remains:
Writer #1: “I’m doing a story on the dramatic number of homeless living in public parks in New York.” (Yes, that’s it.)
Versus this:
Writer #2: “I’m looking for social service employees/execs who can talk to me about how they’re handling the increasing number of homeless citizens living in NYC’s public areas. Especially interested in how budget cuts and staff reductions put stress on services. Please use HARO: Homeless in NYC in the subject heading. Thanks!”
I already feel sorry for the editor who gets to work with writer #1. [db]
3 Responses to “Good queries/bad queries for sources”
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Kristen Kirk
Said this on October 3rd, 2008 at 7:44am:Oh good! I worried that I put too much information in my HARO requests. I often give my topic and a bunch of questions I’m looking to have answered and who ideally could answer them. I always get a great response.
KD
Said this on October 3rd, 2008 at 9:43am:This sounds great. Profnet hasn’t help me, which I’ve always (mostly) attributed to the local/regional publications. Is this mostly for people writing for national publications?
Carolyn Erickson
Said this on October 3rd, 2008 at 10:02am:I haven’t used HARO yet, but I was wondering if the second request might not tip off a competing editor who knows you regularly write for XYZ Magazine, which covers NYC. Is that ever a concern?